Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pre-participation cardiovascular screening: is community screening using hand-held cardiac ultrasound feasible?

Echo Research & Practice volume 2, pages 49–55 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility and costs of utilising hand-held cardiac ultrasound (HHCU) as part of a community-based pre-participation cardiovascular screening programme. Ninety-seven school children were screened using a personal history, a physical examination, a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and a HHCU. A consultant cardiologist independently reviewed and reported the data. Previously undiagnosed cardiovascular abnormalities were identified in nine participants (9%). An additional three participants (3%) were diagnosed with hypertension. The nine abnormalities were identified at a cost of £460 per finding, with a cost of £43 per participant screened. The marginal cost of adding a HHCU to the personal history, physical examination and ECG was £16 per participant. Pre-participation screening in the community using hand-held echocardiography is practical and inexpensive. The additional sensitivity and specificity provided by the ultrasound may enhance screening programmes, thereby reducing false positives and the need for expensive follow-up testing.

References

  1. Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Ackerman MJ, Balady G, Berger S, Cohen D, Dimeff R, Douglas PS, Glover DW, Hutter AM Jr et al. 2007 Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update. Circulation 115 1643–1655. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181423)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Bjørnstad HH, Vanhees L, Biffi A, Borjesson M, Panhuyzen-Goedkoop N, Deligiannis A, Solberg E, Dugmore D et al. 2005 Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. European Heart Journal 26 516–524. (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi108)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spencer KT, Kimura BJ, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ 2013 Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 26 567–581. (doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.04.001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaltman JR, Thompson PD, Lantos J, Berul CI, Botkin J, Cohen JT, Cook NR, Corrado D, Drezner J, Frick KD et al. 2011 Screening for sudden cardiac death in the young. report from the National, Lung, And Blood Institute Working Group. Circulation 123 1911–1918. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.017228)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Heidbuchel H, Sharma S, Link M, Basso C, Biffi A, Buja G, Delise P, Gussac I et al. 2010 Recommendations for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram in the athlete. European Heart Journal 31 243–259. (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp473)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wharton G, Steeds R, Allen J, Brewerton H, Jones R, Kanagala P, Lloyd, G, Masani N, Mathew T, Oxborough D et al. 2012 A standard transthoracic echocardiogram. British Society of Echocardiography Education Committee. http://www.bsecho.org/tte-minimum-dataset/ (27 February 2015, date last accessed).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baggish AL, Hutter AM Jr Wang F, Yared K, Weiner RB, Kupperman E, Picard MH, Wood MJ et al. 2010 Cardiovascular screening in college athletes with and without electrocardiography: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Internal Medicine 152 269–275. (doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-00004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Serra-Grima R, Estorch M, Carrio I, Subirana M, Berna L, Prat T 2000 Marked ventricular repolarization abnormalities in highly trained athletes’ electrocardiograms: clinical and prognostic implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 36 1310–1316. (doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00853-6)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Seshagiri TN, Roberts WC, Epstein SE 1982 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with ventricular septal hypertrophy localized to the apical region of the left ventricle (apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). American Journal of Cardiology 49 1838–1848. (doi:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90200-4)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelliccia A, Maron BJ, Culasso F, Di Paolo FM, Spataro A, Biffi A, Caselli G, Piovano P 2000 Clinical significance of abnormal electrocardiographic patterns in trained athletes. Circulation 102 278–284. (doi:10.1161/01.CIR.102.3.278)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Galderisi M, Santoro A, Versiero M, Lomoriello VS, Esposito R, Raia R, Farina F, Schiattarella PL, Bonito M, Olibet M et al. 2010 Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in non-cardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study. Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 8 51 (doi:10.1186/1476-7120-8-51)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura BJ, DeMaria AN 2005 Technology insight: hand-carried ultrasound cardiac assessment–evolution, not revolution. Nature clinical Practice. Cardiovascular Medicine 2 217–223., quiz 224 (doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0154)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Panoulas VF, Daigeler AL, Malaweera AS, Lota AS, Baskaran D, Rahman S, Nihoyannopoulos P et al. 2013 Pocket-size hand-held cardiac ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical examination in the hands of medical students and junior doctors. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 14 323–330. (doi:10.1093/ehjci/jes140)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi BG, Mukherjee M, Dala P, Young HA, Tracy CM, Katz RJ, Lewis JF 2011 Interpretation of remotely downloaded pocket-size cardiac ultrasound images on a web-enabled smartphone: validation against workstation evaluation. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24 1325–1330. (doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liebo MJ, Israel RL, Lillie EO, Smith MR, Rubenson DS, Topol EJ 2011 Is pocket mobile echocardiography the next-generation stethoscope? A crosssectional comparison of rapidly acquired images with standard transthoracic echocardiography. Annals of Internal Medicine 155 33–38. (doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh S, Bansal M, Maheshwari P, Adams D, Sengupta SP, Price R, Dantin L, Smith M, Kasliwal RR, Pellikka PA et al. 2013 American Society of echocardiography: remote echocardiography with web-based assessments for referrals at a distance (ASE-REWARD) study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 26 221–233. (doi:10.1016/j.echo.2012.12.012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis JF, Maron BJ, Diggs JA, Spencer JE, Mehrotra PP, Curry CL 1989 Preparticipation echocardiographic screening for cardiovascular disease in a large, predominantly black population of collegiate athletes. American Journal of Cardiology 64 1029–1033. (doi:10.1016/0002-9149(89)90802-3)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Riding NR, Sharma S, Salah O, Khalil N, Carré F, George KP, Hamilton B, Chalabi H, Whyte GP, Wilson MG 2015 Systematic echocardiography is not efficacious when screening an ethnically diverse cohort of athletes in West Asia. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 22 263–270. (doi:10.1177/2047487313506549)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fuller CM 2000 Cost effectiveness analysis of screening of high school athletes for risk of sudden cardiac death. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 32 887–890. (doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wyman RA, Chiu RY, Rahko PS 2008 The 5-minute screening echocardiogram for athletes. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 21 786–788. (doi:10.1016/j.echo.2007.11.013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prinz C, Voigt JU 2011 Diagnostic accuracy of a hand-held ultrasound scanner in routine patients referred for echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24 111–116. (doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen GN, Haugen BO, Graven T, Salvesen O, Mjolstad OC, Dalen H 2011 Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography. European Journal of Echocardiography 12 665–670. (doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jer108)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biais M, Carrie C, Delaunay F, Morel N, Revel P, Janvier G 2012 Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting. Critical Care 16 R82 (doi:10.1186/cc11340)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Testuz A, Muller H, Keller PF, Meyer P, Stampfli T, Sekoranja L, Vuille C, Burri H 2013 Diagnostic accuracy of pocket-size handheld echocardiographs used by cardiologists in the acute care setting. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 14 38–42. (doi:10.1093/ehjci/jes085)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Jersey International Centre for Advanced Studies, Jersey General Hospital, Gloucester Street, St Helier, JE1 3QS, Channel Islands, Jersey, UK

    A. R. J. Mitchell BM MD FRCP FESC FACC, R. Hurry MB ChB LLB (Hons) Dip IMC RCS Ed MSc Sports Medicine MFSEM (UK), P. Le Page MBBS BSc & H. MacLachlan MB ChB BSc

Authors
  1. A. R. J. Mitchell BM MD FRCP FESC FACC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Hurry MB ChB LLB (Hons) Dip IMC RCS Ed MSc Sports Medicine MFSEM (UK)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Le Page MBBS BSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. MacLachlan MB ChB BSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. J. Mitchell BM MD FRCP FESC FACC.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articles Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitchell, A.R.J., Hurry, R., Le Page, P. et al. Pre-participation cardiovascular screening: is community screening using hand-held cardiac ultrasound feasible?. Echo Res Pract 2, 49–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0010

Keywords

Echo Research & Practice

ISSN: 2055-0464

Contact us