Skip to main content

Evaluation of the quality of transesophageal echocardiography images and verification of proficiency

Abstract

Various metrics have been used in curriculum-based transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) training programs to evaluate acquisition of proficiency. However, the quality of task completion, that is the final image quality, was subjectively evaluated in these studies. Ideally, the endpoint metric should be an objective comparison of the trainee-acquired image with a reference ideal image. Therefore, we developed a simulator-based methodology of preclinical verification of proficiency (VOP) in trainees by tracking objective evaluation of the final acquired images. We utilized geometric data from the simulator probes to compare image acquisition of anesthesia residents who participated in our structured longitudinal simulator-based TEE educational program vs ideal image planes determined from a panel of experts. Thirty-three participants completed the study (15 experts, 7 postgraduate year (PGY)-1 and 11 PGY-4). The results of our study demonstrated a significant difference in image capture success rates between learners and experts (χ2 = 14.716, df = 2, P < 0.001) with the difference between learners (PGY-1 and PGY-4) not being statistically significant (χ2 = 0, df = 1, P = 1.000). Therefore, our results suggest that novices (i.e. PGY-1 residents) are capable of attaining a level of proficiency comparable to those with modest training (i.e. PGY-4 residents) after completion of a simulation-based training curriculum. However, professionals with years of clinical training (i.e. attending physicians) exhibit a superior mastery of such skills. It is hence feasible to develop a simulator-based VOP program in performance of TEE for junior anesthesia residents.

References

  1. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine 199065 (Supplement 9) S63–S67. (https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laguna MP, de Reijke TM, de la Rosette JJ. How far will simulators be involved into training? Current Urology Reports 200910 97–105. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-009-0019-6)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried GM. FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 200712 210–212. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0355-0)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. American Journal of Surgery 2005190 107–113. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanfey H, Ketchum J, Bartlett J, Markwell S, Meier AH, Williams R, Dunnington G. Verification of proficiency in basic skills for postgraduate year 1 residents. Surgery 2010148 759–766; discussion 766–767. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hafford ML, Van Sickle KR, Willis RE, Wilson TD, Gugliuzza K, Brown KM, Scott DJ. Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel? Surgical Endoscopy 201227 118–126. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2437-7)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawe SR, Pena GN, Windsor JA, Broeders JA, Cregan PC, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ. Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. British Journal of Surgery 2014101 1063–1076. (https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9482)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bose R, Panzica P, Karthik S, Karthik S, Subramaniam B, Pawlowski J, Mitchell J, Mahmood F. Transesophageal echocardiography simulator: a new learning tool. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 200923 544–548. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2009.01.014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bose RR, Matyal R, Warraich HJ, Summers J, Subramaniam B, Mitchell J, Panzica PJ, Shahul S, Mahmood F. Utility of a transesophageal echocardiographic simulator as a teaching tool. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 201125 212–215. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.08.014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matyal R, Mahmood F. Simulator-based transesophageal echocardiographic training with motion analysis. Anesthesiology 2014121 389–399. (https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000234)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogilvie E, Vlachou A, Edsell M, Fletcher SN, Valencia O, Meineri M, Sharma V. Simulation-based teaching versus point-of-care teaching for identification of basic transoesophageal echocardiography views: a prospective randomised study. Anaesthesia 201570 330–335. (https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12903)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma V, Chamos C, Valencia O, Meineri M, Fletcher SN. The impact of internet and simulation-based training on transoesophageal echocardiography learning in anaesthetic trainees: a prospective randomised study. Anaesthesia 201368 621–627. (https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12261)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shakil O, Mahmood B, Matyal R, Jainandunsing JS, Mitchell J, Mahmood F. Simulation training in echocardiography: the evolution of metrics. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 201327 1034–1040. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2012.10.021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Montealegre-Gallegos M, Mahmood F, Kim H, Bergman R, Mitchell JD, Bose R, Hawthorne KM, O'Halloran TD, Wong V, Hess PE, et al. Imaging skills for transthoracic echocardiography in cardiology fellows: the value of motion metrics. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia 201619 245. (https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.179595)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matyal R. Simulator-based transesophageal echocardiographic training with motion analysis. Anesthesiology 2014121 389–399. (https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000234)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell JD, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Mahmood F, Owais K, Wong V, Ferla B, Chowdhury S, Nachshon A, Doshi R, Matyal R. Multimodal perioperative ultrasound course for interns allows for enhanced acquisition and retention of skills and knowledge. A & A Case Reports 20155 119–123. (https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000200)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell JD, Mahmood F, Wong V, Bose R, Nicolai DA, Wang A, Hess PE, Matyal R. Teaching concepts of transesophageal echocardiography via Web-based modules. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 201529 402–409. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The primary author, Robina Matyal, MD received funding from a FAER Research in Education grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faraz Mahmood MD.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matyal, R., Mahmood, F., Knio, Z.O. et al. Evaluation of the quality of transesophageal echocardiography images and verification of proficiency. Echo Res Pract 5, 89–95 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-18-0002

Key Words