Skip to main content

Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis

Abstract

Objective: Due to its circular shape, the area of the proximal left ventricular tract (PLVOT) adjacent to aortic valve can be derived from a single linear diameter. This is also the location of flow acceleration (FA) during systole, and pulse wave Doppler (PWD) sample volume in the PLVOT can lead to overestimation of velocity (V1) and the aortic valve area (AVA). Therefore, it is recommended to derive V1 from a region of laminar flow in the elliptical shaped distal LVOT (away from the annulus). Besides being inconsistent with the assumptions of continuity equation (CE), spatial difference in the location of flow and area measurement can result in inaccurate AVA calculation. We evaluated the impact of FA in the PLVOT on the accuracy of AVA by continuity equation (CE) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: CE-based AVA calculations were performed in patients with AS once with PWD-derived velocity time integral (VTI) in the distal LVOT (VTILVOT) and then in the PLVOT to obtain a FA velocity profile (FA-VTILVOT) for each patient. A paired sample t-test (P < 0.05) was conducted to compare the impact of FA-VTILVOT and VTILVOT on the calculation of AVA.

Result: There were 46 patients in the study. There was a 30.3% increase in the peak FA-VTILVOT as compared to the peak VTILVOT and AVA obtained by FA-VTILVOT was 29.1% higher than obtained by VTILVOT. p]Conclusion: Accuracy of AVA can be significantly impacted by FA in the PLVOT. LVOT area should be measured with 3D imaging in the distal LVOT.

References

  1. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller Jr F & Otto CM. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2017 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hui S, Mahmood F & Matyal R. Aortic valve area-technical communication: continuity and Gorlin equations revisited. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2018 2599–2606. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.027)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hahn RT, Nicoara A, Kapadia S, Svensson L & Martin R. Echocardiographic imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2018 405–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.10.022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Montealegre-Gallegos M, Matyal R, Khabbaz KR, Owais K, Maslow A, Hess P & Mahmood F. Heterogeneity in the structure of the left ventricular outflow tract: a 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2016 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001439)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jainandunsing JS, Mahmood F, Matyal R, Shakil O, Hess PE, Lee J, Panzica PJ & Khabbaz KR. Impact of three-dimensional echocardiography on classification of the severity of aortic stenosis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2013 1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP III, Guyton RA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014 e57–e185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, Vlietstra RE, Bresnahan DR, Bresnahan JF, Smith HC, Hagler DJ & Tajik AJ. Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985 1162–1169. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caballero L, Saura D, Oliva-Sandoval MJ, González-Carrillo J, Espinosa MD, García-Navarro M, Valdés M, Lancellotti P & de la Morena G. Three-dimensional morphology of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on grading aortic stenosis severity. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2017 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatle L, Angelsen BA & Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. British Heart Journal 1980 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.43.3.284)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes Jr DR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB & Tajik AJ. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1988 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)90286-0)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F & Antunes MJ, Baron-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, Borger MA, Carrel TP, De Bonis M, Evangelista A, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal 2012 2451–2496.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2009 1–23; quiz 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith MD, Kwan OL & DeMaria AN. Value and limitations of continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography in estimating severity of valvular stenosis. JAMA 1986 3145–3151.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baumgartner H, Kratzer H, Helmreich G & Kuehn P. Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation. Cardiology 1990 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000174590)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL & Huntsman LL. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1986 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80460-0)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG & Quinones MA. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1986 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.3.452)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L & Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andaleeb A. Ahmed MD MPH.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, A.A., Matyal, R., Mahmood, F. et al. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis. Echo Res Pract 6, 97–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-19-0017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-19-0017

Key Words