Skip to main content

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography

Abstract

The guideline provides a practical step-by-step guide in order to facilitate high-quality echocardiographic studies of patients with aortic stenosis. In addition, it addresses commonly encountered yet challenging clinical scenarios and covers the use of advanced echocardiographic techniques, including TOE and Dobutamine stress echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis.

References

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG & Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006 368 1005–1011. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, Tornos P, Vanoverschelde JL, Vermeer F, Boersma E, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro Heart Survey on valvular Heart Disease. European Heart Journal 2003 24 1231–1243. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson S, Rana B, Oxborough D, Steeds R, Monaghan MJ, Stout M, Pearce K, Harkness A, Ring L, Paton M, et al. A practical guideline for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram in adults: the British Society of Echocardiography minimum dataset. Echo Research andPractice 2020 7 G59–G93. (https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0026)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, Lancellotti P, LeFevre M, Miller Jr F & Otto CM. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. European Heart journal: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 18 254–275.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, lung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Munoz DR, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European Heart Journal 2017 38 2739–2786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin III JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, et al. ACC/ AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease, journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020 2020 1–173.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piazza N, De Jaegere P, Schultz C, Becker AE, Serruys PW & Anderson RH. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2008 1 74–81. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.780858)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Steinberger J, Moller JH, Berry JM & Sinaiko AR. Echocardiographic diagnosis of heart disease in apparently healthy adolescents. Pediatrics 2000 105 815–818. (https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.4.815)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tutar E, Ekici F, Atalay S & Nacar N. The prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in newborns by echocardiographic screening. American Heart Journal 2005 150 513–515. (https://doi.org/10.1016/).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Movahed MR, Hepner AD & Ahmadi-Kashani M. Echocardiographic prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in the population. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2006 15 297–299. (https://doi.org/10.1016/hlc.2006.06.001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts WC & Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, With or Without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005 111 920–925. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, Russo A, Nkomo VT, Sundt TM, Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ & Enriquez-Sarano M. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community Circulation 2008 117 2776–2784. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740878)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, Thanassoulis G, Tremblay S, Jamorski MT, Webb GD & Siu SC. Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 2008 300 1317–1325. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.ll.1317)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Gill E, Prueitt A, Byers PH & Otto CM. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008 94 1634–1638. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.132092)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang JW, Song HG, Yang DH, Baek S, Kim DH, Song JM, Kang DH, Lim TH & Song JK. Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2013 6 150–161. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sievers HH, Stierle U, Hachmann RMS & Charitos EI. New insights in the association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype, aortic configuration and valve haemodynamics. European journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2016 49 439–446. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv087)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim D, Shim CY, Kim YJ, Nam K, Hong GR, Lee SH, Lee S & Ha JW. Differences in flow-gradient patterns between severe bicuspid aortic stenosis and severe tricuspid aortic stenosis - mechanistic insight from multimodal imaging. Circulation Journal 2019 84 119–126. (https://doi.org/10.1253/cirq.CJ-19-0702)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsang MYC, Abudiab MM, Ammash NM, Naqvi TZ, Edwards WD, Nkomo VT & Pellikka PA. Quadricuspid aortic valve: characteristics, associated structural cardiovascular abnormalities, and clinical outcomes. Circulation 2016 133 312–319. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017743)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olson LJ, Subramanian R & Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of 225 cases. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1984 59 835–841. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65618-3)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Novaro GM, Mishra M & Griffin BR. Incidence and echocardiographic features of congenital unicuspid aortic valve in an adult population, journal of Heart Valve Disease 2003 12 674–678.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Slostad BD, Witt CM, O’Leary PW, Maleszewski JJ, Scott CG, Dearani JA & Pellikka PA. Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography and intraoperative surgical inspection of the unicuspid aortic valve. American Journal of Cardiology 2019 123 967–971. (https://doi.org/10.1016/[am]card.2018.12.010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Subramanian R, Olson LJ & Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of pure aortic stenosis: a study of 374 cases. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1984 59 683–690. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62057-6)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE, Kitzman DW & Otto CM. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study, journal of the American College of Cardiology 1997 29 630–634. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00563-3)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palta S, Pai AM, Gill KS & Pai RG. New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis: implications for secondary prevention. Circulation 2000 101 2497–2502. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.21.2497)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L & Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985 72 810–818. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL & Huntsman LL. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography, journal of the American College of Cardiology 1986 7 509–517. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80460-0)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG & Quinones MA. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1986 73 452–459. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.3.452)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB St Tajik AJ. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients, journal of the American College of Cardiology 1988 11 1227–1234. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(88)90286-0)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilon D, Cape EG, Handschumacher MD, Song JK, Solheim J, VanAuker M, King MEE & Levine RA. Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics ofaortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies, journal of the American College of Cardiology 2002 40 1479–1486. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02269-6)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull C. & Schwaegler RG. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997 95 2262–2270. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.9.2262)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber CA, Wachtell K, Seifert R, Chambers JB, Kuck KH & Ray S. Prognostic value of energy loss index in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 2013 127 1149–1156. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.078857)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hatle L, Angelsen BA & Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. British Heart journal 1980 43 284–292. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.43.3.284)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, Vlietstra RE, Bresnahan DR, Bresnahan JF, Smith HC, Hagler DJ & Tajik AJ. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985 71 1162–1169. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, Pearlman AS, Verrier ED, Thomas R, Kraft CD & Otto CM. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994 89 827–835. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.89.2.827)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Voelker W, Reul H, Nienhaus G, Stelzer T, Schmitz B, Steegers A & Karsch KR. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation 1995 91 1196–1204. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.4.1196)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coffey S, Cox B & Williams MJ. The prevalence, incidence, progression, and risks of aortic valve sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014 63 2852–2861. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G & Baumgartner H. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 2000 343 611–617. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200008313430903)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, Scholten C, Heger M, Gabriel H, Binder T, Maurer G & Baumgartner H. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. European Heart Journal 2004 25 199–205. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, Malouf JF, Bailey KR, Scott CG, Barnes ME & Tajik AJ. Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up. Circulation 2005 111 3290–3295. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.495903)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, Czerny M, Mundigler G, Graf S, Bergler-Klein J, Grimm M, Gabriel H & Maurer G. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010 121 151–156. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pai RG, Kapoor N, Bansal RC & Varadarajan P. Malignant natural history of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: benefit of aortic valve replacement. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2006 82 2116–2122. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.043)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Malouf J, Le Tourneau T, Pellikka P, Sundt TM, Scott C, Schaff HV St Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic valve stenosis in community medical practice: determinants of outcome and implications for aortic valve replacement. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012 144 1421–1427. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.075)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bohbot Y, Rusinaru D, Delpierre Q, Marechaux S St Tribouilloy C. Risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction using peak aortic jet velocity: an outcome study. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2017 10e006760. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006760)

  44. Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, Yun SC, Kim DH, Song JM, Choo SJ, Park SW, Song JK, Lee JW, et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010 121 1502–1509. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.909903)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Marechaux S, Ringle A, Rusinaru D, Debry N, Bohbot Y St Tribouilloy C. Prognostic value of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Journal of the American Heart Association 2016 S III 1. (https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003146)

  46. Bohbot Y, Kowalski C, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Marechaux S & Tribouilloy C. Impact of mean transaortic pressure gradient on long-term outcome in patients With severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, journal of the American Heart Association 2017 6 672. (https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005850)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kanamori N, Taniguchi T, Morimoto T, Watanabe H, Shiomi H, Ando K, Murata K, Kitai T, Kawase Y, Izumi C, et al. prognostic impact of aortic valve area in conservatively managed patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. journal of the American Heart Association 2019 8 1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ross J & Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968 38 (Supplement) 61–67. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.38.1s5.v-61)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, Cohn LH, Koster JK & Collins JJ. Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation 1980 62 42–48. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.62.1.42)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME, Appleton CP, Yancy CW, Eichhorn EJ & Grayburn PA. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. American journal of Cardiology 1995 75 191–194. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)80078-8)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, Osborn SL, Roger VL, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, Seward JB & Tajik AJ. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis With severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation 1997 95 2395–2400. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.10.2395)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Morrow AG, Roberts WC, Ross J, Fisher RD, Behrendt DM, Mason DT St Braunwald E. Obstruction to left ventricular outflow. Current concepts of management and operative treatment. Annals of Internal Medicine 1968 69 1255–1286. (https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-69-6-1255)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jander N, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Boman K, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Nienaber CA, Pedersen TR, Ray S, et al. Indexing aortic valve area by body surface area increases the prevalence of severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2014 100 28–33. (https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304443)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saito T, Muro T, Takeda H, Hyodo E, Ehara S, Nakamura Y, Hanatani A, Shimada K & Yoshiyama M. Prognostic value of aortic valve area index in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. American journal of Cardiology 2012 110 93–97. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.056)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rusinaru D, Malaquin D, Marechaux S, Debry N & Tribouilloy C. Relation of dimensionless index to long-term outcome in aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF. jACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 766–775. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.023)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stoddard MF, Arce J, Liddell NE, Peters G, Dillon S & Kupersmith J. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis. American Heart journal 1991 122 1415–1422. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(91)90585-6)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cormier B, Iung B, Porte JM, Barbant S & Vahanian A. Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. American journal of Cardiology 1996 77 882–885. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89190-4)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, Magnin D, Anguenot T, Schiele F & Bassand JP Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 1997 78 68–73. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.78.l.68)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L & Pibarot P. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be. journal of the American College of Cardiology 2003 41 435–442. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02764-x)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bahlmann E, Cramariuc D, Gerdts E, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Nienaber CA, Eriksen E, Wachtell K, Chambers J, Kuck KH St Ray S. Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy. jACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2010 3 555–562. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yoshida H, Seo Y, Ishizu T, Izumo M, Akashi YJ, Yamashita E, Otsuji Y, Negishi K St Takeuchi M. Prognostic value of energy loss coefficient for predicting asymptomatic aortic stenosis outcomes: direct comparison with aortic valve area, journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2019 32 351.e3–358.e3. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.10.016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dubrey SW St Falk RH. Optimal number of beats for the Doppler measurement of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation, journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 1997 10 67–71. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-7317(97)80034-x)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Blackshear JL, Kapples EJ, Lane GE St Safford RE. Beat-by-beat aortic valve area measurements indicate constant orifice area in aortic stenosis: analysis of Doppler data with varying RR intervals, journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 1992 5 414-420. (https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80274-5)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Esquitin KA, Khalique OK, Liu Q, Kodali SK, Marcoff L, Nazif TM, George I, Vahl TP, Leon MB St Hahn RT. Accuracy of the single cycle length method for calculation of aortic effective orifice area in irregular heart rhythms, journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2019 32 344–350. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.11.018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Little SH, Chan KL St Burwash IG. Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 2007 93 848–855. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.098392)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kadem L, Dumesnil JG, Rieu R, Durand LG, Garcia D St Pibarot P. Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart 2005 91 354–361. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.030601)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Mascherbauer J, Fuchs C, Stoiber M, Schima H, Pernicka E, Maurer G St Baumgartner H. Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro. European Heart Journal 2008 29 2049–2057. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn209)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nielsen OW, Sajadieh A, Sabbah M, Greve AM, Olsen MH, Boman K, Nienaber CA, Kesaniemi YA, Pedersen TR, Willenheimer R, et al. Assessing optimal blood pressure in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: the Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis Study (SEAS). Circulation 2016 134 455–468. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.021213)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Saeed S, Scalise F, Chambers JB St Mancia G. Hypertension in aortic stenosis: a focused review and recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of Hypertension 2020 38 1211–1219. (https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002426)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Saeed S, Mancia G, Rajani R, Parkin D St Chambers JB. Antihypertensive treatment with calcium channel blockers in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis: relationship with all-cause mortality. International Journal of Cardiology 2020 298 122–125. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG St Pellikka PA. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis With preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation 2013 128 1781–1789. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation 2018 138 248.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. European Heart Journal 2018 39 3021–3104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Henkel DM, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, Michelena HI, Sarano ME, Schaff HV, Scott CG & Pellikka PA. Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis: characteristics and outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012 60. 2325–2329. (https://doi.org/10.1016/jacc.2012.08.988)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Dahl JS, Eleid MF, Michelena HI, Scott CG, Suri RM, Schaff HV St Pellikka PA. Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 e002917. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002917)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gunther S & Grossman W. Determinants of ventricular function in pressure-overload hypertrophy in man. Circulation 1979 59 679–688. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.59.4.679)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bohbot Y, de Meester de Ravenstein C, Chadha G, Rusinaru D, Belkhir K, Trouillet C, Pasquet A, Marechaux S, Vanoverschelde JL & Tribouilloy C. Relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction and mortality in asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic patients With severe aortic stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2019 12 38–48. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.029)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Minamino-Muta E, Kato T, Morimoto T, Taniguchi T, Izumi C, Nakatsuma K, Inoko M, Shirai S, Kanamori N, Murata K, et al. Decline in left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up. patients with severe aortic stenosis. jACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2019 12 2499–2511. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.015)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Grossman W, Jones D & McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle, journal of Clinical Investigation 1975 56 56–64. (https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108079)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Aurigemma GP, Silver KH, McLaughlin M, Mauser J & Gaasch WH. Impact of chamber geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients >60 years of age with aortic stenosis. American journal of Cardiology 1994 74 794–798. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(94)90437-5)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Cioffi G, Faggiano P, Vizzardi E, Tarantini L, Cramariuc D, Gerdts E St de Simone G. Prognostic effect of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2011 97 301–307. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.192997)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gerdts E, Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Cioffi G, Lonnebakken MT, Cramariuc D, Rogge BP St Devereux RB. Relation of left ventricular mass to prognosis in initially asymptomatic mild to moderate aortic valve stenosis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 e003644; discussion e003644. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003644)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ng ACT, Delgado V, Bertini M, Antoni ML, van Bommel RJ, van Rijnsoever EPM, van der Kley F, Ewe SH, Witkowski T, Auger D, etal. Alterations in multidirectional myocardial functions in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction: a two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis. European Heart journal 2011 32 1542–1550. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr084)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Slimani A, Melchior J, de Meester C, Pierard S, Roy C, Amzulescu M, Bouzin C, Maes F, Pasquet A, Pouleur A-C, et al. Relative contribution of afterload and interstitial fibrosis to myocardial function in severe aortic stenosis, journal of the American College of Cardiology: Imaging 2020 13 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kearney LG, Lu K, Ord M, Patel SK, Profitis K, Matalanis G, Burrell LM St Srivastava PM. Global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging 2012 13 827–833. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jesll5)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Fries B, Liu D, Gaudron P, Hu K, Nordbeck P, Ertl G, Weidemann F St Herrmann S. Role of global longitudinal strain in the prediction of outcome in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. American Journal of Cardiology 2017 120 640–647. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.032)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhu D, Ito S, Miranda WR, Nkomo VT, Pislaru SV, Villarraga HR, Pellikka PA, Crusan DJ St Oh JK. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain is associated with long-term outcomes in moderate aortic stenosis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2020 13 e009958. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009958)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Magne J, Cosyns B, Popescu BA, Carstensen HG, Dahl J, Desai MY, Kearney L, Lancellotti P, Marwick TH, Sato K, et al. Distribution and prognostic significance of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in asymptomatic significant aortic stenosis: an individual participant data meta-analysis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2019 12 84–92. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.ll.005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Pai RG, Varadarajan P, Kapoor N St Bansal RC. Aortic valve replacement improves survival in severe aortic stenosis associated with severe pulmonary hypertension. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2007 84 80–85. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.094)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Zuern CS, Eick C, Rizas K, Stoleriu C, Woernle B, Wildhirt S, Herdeg C, Stock U, Gawaz M St Bauer A. Prognostic value of mild-to-moderate pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Clinical Research in Cardiology 2012 101 81–88. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0367-3)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Mutlak D, Aronson D, Carasso S, Lessick J, Reisner SA St Agmon Y. Frequency, determinants and outcome of pulmonary hypertension in patients with aortic valve stenosis. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2012 343 397–401. (https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182309431)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Roselli EE, Azim AA, Houghtaling PL, Jaber WA St Blackstone EH. Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse early and late outcomes after aortic valve replacement: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012 144 1067.e2–1074.e2. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.029)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Miceli A, Varone E, Gilmanov D, Murzi M, Simeoni S, Concistre G, Marchi F, Solinas M St Glauber M. Impact of pulmonary hypertension on mortality after operation for isolated aortic valve stenosis. International Journal of Cardiology 2013 168 3556–3559. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Levy F, Bohbot Y, Sanhadji K, Rusinaru D, Ringle A, Delpierre Q, Smaali S, Gun M, Marechaux S St Tribouilloy C. Impact of pulmonary hypertension on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 2018 19 553–561. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jexl66)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Augustine DX, Coates-Bradshaw LD, Willis J, Harkness A, Ring L, Grapsa J, Coghlan G, Kaye N, Oxborough D, Robinson S, et al. Echocardiography assessment of pulmonary hypertension: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Research andPractice 2018 5 G11–G24. (https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-17-0071)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Buzzatti N, Maisano F, Latib A, Cioni M, Taramasso M, Mussardo M, Colombo A St Alfieri O. Computed tomography-based evaluation of aortic annulus, prosthesis size and impact on early residual aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2013 43 43–50; discussion 50. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezsl55)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Khalique OK, Kodali SK, Paradis J-M, Nazif TM, Williams MR, Einstein AJ, Pearson GD, Harjai K, Grubb K, George I, etal. Aortic annular sizing using a Novel 3-dimensional echocardiographic method. Circulation 2014 7 155–163. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001153)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Stella S, Italia L, Geremia G, Rosa I, Ancona F, Marini C, Capogrosso C, Giglio M, Montorfano M, Latib A, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of aortic annular measurements obtained from echocardiographic 3D manual and semi-automated software analyses in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: implication for prosthesis size selection. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 2019 20 45–55. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Bleakley C, Eskandari M & Monaghan M. 3D transoesophageal echocardiography in the TAVI sizing arena: should we do it and how do we do it? Echo Research and Practice 2017 4 R21–R32. (https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-16-0041)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Mehrotra P, Flynn AW, Jansen K, Tan TC, Mak G, Julien HM, Zeng X, Picard MH, Passeri JJ & Hung J. Differential left ventricular outflow tract remodeling and dynamics in aortic stenosis, journal of the American Society of’Echocardiography 2015 28 1259–1266. (https://doi.org/10.1016/1.echo.2015.07.018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A, Dumesnil JG, Meimoun P, Pasquet A, Bergeron S, Arsenault M, Le Tourneau T, Ennezat PV, et al. Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. European Heart Journal 2010 31 1390–1397. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq076)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, O’ Connor K, Dulgheru R, Rosea M St Pierard LA. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2012 126 851–859. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.088427)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Masri A, Goodman AL, Barr T, Grimm RA, Sabik JF, Gillinov AM, Rodriguez LL, Svensson LG, Griffin BP & Desai MY. Predictors of long-term outcomes in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular systolic function undergoing exercise echocardiography. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 9 e004689. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004689)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Goublaire C, Melissopoulou M, Lobo D, Kubota N, Verdonk C, Cimadevilla C, Codogno I, Brochet E, Vahanian A & Messika-Zeitoun D. Prognostic value of exercise-stress echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. jACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2018 11 787–795. (https://doi.org/10.1016/cmg.2017.03.020)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Minners J, Allgeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kienzle RP, Neumann FJ St Jander N. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. European Heart journal 2008 29 1043–1048. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Namasivayam M, He W, Churchill TW, Capoulade R, Liu S, Lee H, Danik JS, Picard MH, Pibarot P, Levine RA, et al. Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis, journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020 75 1758–1769. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Kang DH, Jang JY, Park SJ, Kim DH, Yun SC, Song JM, Park SW, Chung CH, Song JK St Lee JW. Watchful observation versus early aortic valve replacement for symptomatic patients with normal flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2015 101 1375–1381. (https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307528)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Chadha G, Bohbot Y, Rusinaru D, Marechaux S St Tribouilloy C. Outcome of normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a propensity-matched study, journal of the American Heart Association 2019 8 e012301. (https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012301)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Maes F, Pierard S, de Meester C, Boulif J, Amzulescu M, Vancraeynest D, Pouleur AC, Pasquet A, Gerber B St Vanoverschelde JL. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction, journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017 19 37. (https://doi.org/10.1186/sl2968-017-0344-8)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P St Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007 115 2856–2864. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Jander N, Minners J, Holme I, Gerdts E, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, Kesaniemi YA, Malbecq W, et al. Outcome of patients with low-gradient ‘severe’ aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2011 123 887–895. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.983510)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Marechaux S, Castel, AL, Debry N, Maizel J, Mentaverri R, Kamel S, Slama M St Levy F. Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015 65 55–66. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.080)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Berthelot-Richer M, Pibarot P, Capoulade R, Dumesnil JG, Dahou A, Thebault C, Le Ven F St Clavel MA. Discordant grading of aortic stenosis severity: echocardiographic predictors of survival benefit associated with aortic valve replacement. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 9 797–805. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.026)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, Davin L, O’Connor K, Rosca M, Szymanski C, Cosyns B St Pierard LA. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012 59 235–243. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.072)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Ozkan A, Hachamovitch R, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM St Marwick TH. Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation 2013 128 622–631. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Pawade T, Clavel MA, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L, Renard C, Gun M, Jenkins WSA, Macron L, et al. Computed tomography aortic valve calcium scoring in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2018 11 e007146. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Loho N, Rader F, Baumgartner H, Beanlands RS, Chayer B, Kadem L, et al. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation 2006 113 711–721. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, Petit H, Baleynaud S, Chauvel C, Pop C, Ohlmann P, Lelguen C, Dehant P, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 2003 108 319–324. (https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000079171.43055.46)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Clavel MA, Fuchs C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Baumgartner H, Bergler-Klein J, Beanlands RS, Mathieu P, Magne J, etal. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS study. Circulation 2008 118 (Supplement) S234–S242. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757427)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Tribouilloy C, Levy F, Rusinaru D, Gueret P, Petit-Eisenmann H, Baleynaud S, Jobic Y, Adams C, Lelong B, Pasquet A, et al. Outcome after aortic valvereplacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2009 53 1865–1873. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.026)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Fougeres E, Tribouilloy C, Monchi M, Petit-Eisenmann H, Baleynaud S, Pasquet A, Chauvel C, Metz D, Adams C, Rusinaru D, et al. Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment. European Heart Journal 2012 33 2426–2433. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehsl76)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Ennezat PV, Toussaint J, Marechaux S, Le Tourneau T, Aubert JM, Asseman P, Lejemtel TH & Deklunder G. Low-level exercise echocardiography fails to elicit left ventricular contractile reserve in patients with aortic stenosis, reduced ejection fraction, and low transvalvular gradient. Echocardiography 2007 24 47–51. (https://doi.org/10.1111/1.1540-8175.2007.00349.X)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Chahal NS, Drakopoulou M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez AM, Manivarmane R, Khattar R & Senior R. Resting aortic valve area at normal transaortic flow rate reflects true valve area in suspected low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. jACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 1133–1139. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.021)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Hayek S, Pibarot P, Harzand A, Cheng JW, Gay H, Chrysohoou C, Ribeiro H, Rodes-Cabau J, Babaliaros V & Lerakis S. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for risk stratification of patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. jACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 380–382. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ribeiro HB, Lerakis S, Gilard M, Cavalcante JL, Makkar R, Herrmann HC, Windecker S, Enriquez-Sarano M, Cheema AN, Nombela-Franco L, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the TOPAS-TAVI Registr, journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018 71 1297–1308. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Maes F, Lerakis S, Barbosa Ribeiro H, Gilard M, Cavalcante JL, Makkar R, Herrmann HC, Windecker S, Enriquez-Sarano M, Cheema AN, et al. Outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%: a substudy from the TOPAS-TAVI Registry. JAMA Cardiology 2019 4 64–70. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4320)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Cueff C, Serfaty JM, Cimadevilla C, Laissy JP, Himbert D, Tubach F, Duval X, lung B, Enriquez-Sarano M, Vahanian A, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart 2011 97 721–726. (https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.198853)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Clavel MA, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, Aggarwal SR, Malouf J, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Cueff C, Larose E, Capoulade R, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013 62 2329–2338. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Zilberszac R, Gabriel H, Schemper M, Zahler D, Czerny M, Maurer G St Rosenhek R. Outcome of combined Stenoticand regurgitant aortic valve disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013 61 1489–1495. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.ll.070)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Zilberszac R, Gleiss A, Binder T, Laufer G, Grimm M, Gabriel H, Maurer G & Rosenhek R. Prognostic relevance of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 2018 19 985–992. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey027)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Baumgartner H, HungJ, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, lung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of the American Society of’Echocardiography 2009 22 1–23; quiz 101. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Cavalcante JL, Rijal S, Abdelkarim I, Althouse AD, Sharbaugh MS, Fridman Y, Soman P, Forman DE, Schindler JT, Gleason TG, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis is prevalent in older patients with aortic stenosis and carries worse prognosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017 19 98. (https://doi.org/10.1186/sl2968-017-0415-x)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Castano A, Narotsky DL, Hamid N, Khalique OK, Morgenstern R, DeLuca A, Rubin J, Chiuzan C, Nazif T, Vahl T, et al. Unveiling transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and its predictors among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. European Heart Journal 2017 38 2879–2887. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx350)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Scully PR, Treibel TA, Fontana M, Lloyd G, Mullen M, Pugliese F, Hartman N, Hawkins PN, Menezes LJ & Moon JC. Prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018 71 463–464. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.ll.037)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Scully PR, Patel KP, Treibel TA, Thornton GD, Hughes RK, Chadalavada S, Katsoulis M, Hartman N, Fontana M, Pugliese F, et al. Prevalence and outcome of dual aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloid pathology in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. European Heart Journal 2020 41 2759–2767. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaal70)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Ring MRCP.

Additional information

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this guidance.

This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articles Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ring, L., Shah, B.N., Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 8, G19–G59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0035

Key Words